Tactics are Political

There is a lot of chatter around Build: why do we insist on the term “organizing project”? How is that really different from a caucus (is it?) We think it depends on a couple of key definitions.

We believe a caucus is a group of people united around a common set of politics (like the Libertarian Socialist Caucus or, locally in Portland, the Red Caucus). People in a caucus probably approach political questions like “hierarchy: good or bad?” from the same angle. They might think that certain types of organizing trump others, like basebuilding versus Alinsky-style win-lose campaigns. They have a political vision for DSA, and they want to see it enacted. We think that can be good, and some Builders are members of caucuses, but that’s not Build itself.

Build is a tactical project to support the development of militant, grounded strategies across the country. The socialist left in America is weak, and we think that if people have an idea to strengthen it and the capacity to put that idea into practice, it’s probably worth a shot! (We also believe that national should be connected to all these experiments, especially in the critical debrief phase, whether it’s a success or not). This is why all of us are in DSA: because DSA provides a big tent under which people work together, address the concerns of the day and build for the future.

The problem is that DSA grew quickly, and there are certainly people in DSA who believe they DO know the one true way to make socialism happen. Sometimes those people are in charge, and they block resources and organizing power from getting to people who have a different idea of how things should go. Other times, sheer lack of capacity at national can have a deleterious effect. However these things happen, we all know that they do. Just about everybody in DSA has had a frustrating experience with the organization.

So at Build, we’ve decided to do what organizers do: get together and provide a solution. That’s why we publish the zine with your organizing stories, and it’s why we provide trainings. Are these political things? Yes! Everything is political, and whether and how you choose to help (or not) your comrades is a political choice. This is part of why we don’t consider Build a caucus, because our team’s members hold a diverse (and sometimes conflicting) set of political tendencies, which informs our perspectives on tactics.

If your vision is a staff-led organization, well, Build flies in the face of that vision. We aren’t exactly sly about believing in a member-led DSA. And we believe that national has an absolutely key role to play in gathering up the successes and failures of our work around the country so we can ALL learn from our common project; it should be a useful, vibrant part of our organizing that pushes our collective project forward.

That’s what we are organizing for at convention, and that’s why we print the zines and distribute the stories and record the trainings. Because DSA is yours to build, and we want to make sure you have the resources, support and space to build it.

Yours ‘til the forever victory,


Build will endorse an array of proposals for the 2019 National Convention. So far, we’ve endorsed Pass the Hat.


Pass the Hat

Proposed Addition to Article II of DSA National Bylaws: Require that
National Pays Stipends to Locals

Section 7.

In addition to any procedures determined for the sharing of dues, the National Organization shall pay a standard monthly or quarterly stipend to each Local, whether or not incorporated as a separate entity, that (1) has a valid bank or credit union account into which the stipend can be deposited; and (2) regularly provides the National Organization with updated contact information for the Local and its leadership. Locals may use their stipends for any lawful purpose in their sole discretion, with the exception of electoral contributions or expenditures implicating campaign finance requirements.

The standard stipend shall be no less than $100 per month if paid monthly or $300 per quarter if paid quarterly. The standard stipend may be adjusted upward by the NPC, but shall always be the same for all Locals receiving it.


  • Erika P, Lincoln

  • Jennifer B, San Francisco

  • Tawny T, NYC

  • Zac E, Red River Valley


Join Build to help us work on and review other resolutions for Convention.

Why Are We Proposing This?

Pass the Hat: We Must Invest in Our Chapters in Order to Grow

  • We have to invest material resources in chapters if we want to see our membership grow. $100/month would allow chapters across the country to do the following, without requiring overtaxed core organizers to spend their own money footing the bill:

    • Rent safe, inclusive meeting spaces

    • Provide transportation to members traveling for regional meetings and events

    • Provide food and snacks for meetings and new member orientations

    • Print or purchase t-shirts, flyers, cards, posters, and other propaganda, or purchase buttonmakers and other means of propaganda production

    • Purchase books and print reading materials for political education

    • Much, much more!

  • The baseline $100/mo stipend is a very small portion of the national budget (only $180,000/year if all of the 150 chapters we have now qualify), but is enough to pay some basic chapter expenses without requiring core members in small chapters to foot the bill for everything.

DSA Needs to Better Distribute (and Redistribute) its Resources

  • Socialists should redistribute wealth! This proposal effectively does that by providing funds to chapters, the vast majority of which are small and lack resources.

  • National currently only provides a very small amount of funding to chapters in the form of dues sharing. Chapters lack financial resources for basic needs, like holding meetings, printing literature, funding their efforts. If we expect chapters to do local, regional, and/or national work, they must be funded!

  • Current dues sharing perpetuates disparities between chapter finances. Members pay annual dues by default, but can opt in to monthly dues. National returns a small fraction (20%) of monthly dues to the home chapters of members who opt in to paying monthly dues. This is only approximately $75,000/year across all chapters, and most members paying monthly dues reside in larger, wealthier chapters.

Strengthen Bonds Between Chapters and the National Organization

  • Many chapters are skeptical of National and see little incentive to stay affiliated. We must rebuild faith in the National Organization by creating a real material reason for chapters to stay affiliated and to strengthen bonds with National.

  • Chapters frequently request money for various things, but, too often, chapters that are well-connected to the NPC and National’s staff are the only ones to hear back. This proposal reduces the administrative burden on both chapters and busy staff by providing a (nearly) automated stipend, freeing up staff from the hassle of responding to reimbursement requests.

  • Currently, many members are shifting from paying dues or donations to National to giving directly to their chapters, because they do not believe that money sent to National is used effectively.

FAQ - Some Responses

Concern: How can we afford paying up to $180,000/year on this? Shouldn’t we spend it on national campaigns voted on by the membership?

Answer: Many chapters can’t even commit meaningfully to working on national priorities because they lack the funding to do so. This stipend helps us facilitate more and better work on priorities campaigns.

Another Answer: $180,000 is about the same as what National recently voted to spend on CRM and VAN access through The Movement Cooperative, a purchase that many chapters will not effectively be able to use unless they already have the infrastructure to run intensive, data-oriented campaigns.

One More Answer: This is an investment that will pay for itself over time. If our small chapters have the resources so they can focus on organizing instead of scraping by just to fund meeting spaces and purchases of basic needs such as shirts, buttons, and other propaganda, they will bring in more members. More members = more dues!

Concern: Larger chapters don’t need stipends, shouldn’t we just give them chapters with fewer members?

Answer: As socialists, we should be promoting universal benefits in all of our work. By universally giving each chapter $100/month, we remove unnecessary administrative work of seeing if a chapter meets criteria for the stipend, and get the money to chapters quicker. Plus, it goes without saying that not all larger chapters are well-off, and in any case they should be supported too!

Concern: How can we give stipends to unincorporated chapters? Isn't that a huge legal risk? Would national be sending money to members’ personal bank accounts if the chapter is unincorporated?

Answer: Chapters would need to have a bank or credit union account in their own name to qualify. Stipends would not be paid to individual members. Unincorporated associations that are not separate 501c4-registered entities can often get bank accounts, but it does depend on the particular state and financial institution. The point is to pay the stipend to any chapter that does have a valid bank account in its own name, not to force chapters to incorporate if they don't need to. However, depending on state law and local financial institution policies, some chapters may need to incorporate to take advantage of the stipend.

Concern: Why can't chapters use the stipend for electoral expenses? Isn't that unfair?

Answer: Electoral expenses are unique because they often come with very complicated campaign finance law requirements. The stipend may not be used for any electoral expenses that could create additional legal obligations for the national organization.

Concern: Why is this a bylaw and not a resolution, isn't it wrong to tie National's hands?

Answer: The stipend would be a new program, different from dues sharing, so it needs its own section in the bylaws.

Another Answer: There needs to be a mandatory baseline for providing chapter support that National is required to follow. As we've seen with the passed-but-unfulfilled Bail Fund resolution from the 2017 convention, which instructed National to create a bail fund to support members arrested during direct actions, the National Organization and the NPC sometimes simply ignore resolutions. This proposal builds in flexibility for the NPC to increase the stipend later if it would be helpful, but the $100/month or $300/quarter baseline needs be codified to ensure a minimal level of chapter support.

Concern: Didn’t the NPC vote against co-sponsoring this amendment?

Answer: Yes they did. There is broad support for this and we wanted to give national leaders a chance to join us.. Members getting to vote on this bylaws resolution is the next step, and we hope you'll agree that passing the hat benefits all of us. Vote yes to pass the hat, and come build with us.